Planning…when teachers think of planning, the first
thing we usually think of is lesson planning—what we are going to teach, and in
what time frame we are going to teach it.
The next step of planning, after deciding what we are going to teach, is
how we’re going to teach it—the presentation.
There is much more to planning a lesson than finding a book on a topic
and making some copies.
To begin planning a
lesson, especially one using/integrating technology, teachers should consider
the students they are planning to teach.
Are they primary, elementary, middle, or high school students? Are there students with IEPs (Individualized
Education Plans) in the class? Are there
more girls than boys in the room or vice versa?
All of these factors must be taken into consideration in order to plan a
lesson focused on student engagement and learning.
To
what grade level is the lesson going to be taught?
The world we live in
today is rich in technology. Our
students and children have been deemed “Digital Natives”. They are growing up in a digital-based
society. Technology is almost an inborn
characteristic—children are exposed to it almost immediately. We've all seen babies playing with their
mother’s phones or tablets while in a waiting room. I myself am guilty of giving
my children technology to keep them quiet!
There are some experts who do not believe that technology is appropriate
for younger students/children. Setzer
and Monke in an issue of Education and
Technology: Critical and Reflective Practices stated their opinion that
computers should only be introduced to students when they are in high school—specifically
after puberty—because it is at this point in their intellectual maturity that
the “forced thinking” caused by the technology is not damaging to the student’s
development (Setzer & Monke, 2001).
Picciano points out that while older students are more likely to make
use of technology based on the curriculum, such as computer literacy courses
and career readiness skills, that Papert (who studied with Piaget) believes students as young as ages 7-11
can benefit from using technology because their logical thinking begins around
that age range. He also argues that
student readiness is a moot point because parents have most likely already
allowed the students to have and/or use technology (Picciano, 2011). Teachers should use professional judgment
regarding student readiness when planning lessons implementing technology.
Will
the lesson be presented to students with special needs?
Technology can be very beneficial
for students with special needs. “Technology
is now being used by children who have difficulty learning through conventional
means” (Picciano, 2011 pg. 40).
Assistive technology is available for students with vision, hearing, or
mobility impairments as well as learning disabilities. Although access to these devices may be
limited, and they are often expensive, there are grants and programs available
to help schools acquire some of these devices (Picciano, 2011). When planning lessons for students with
special needs, teachers need to be familiar with the resources available for
these students. See the list of links for assistive technology for sources of devices, funding, and support. To see assistive technology in action, take a look at the video below.
Is
the lesson being planned for boys or girls?
For many years, there
has been a vast difference between the number of boys and girls in science, math,
and technology career fields. Although
research shows that the gap is closing, there remains a distinct difference
between males’ interest and females’ interest in technology (Bae & Smith,
1997). “Whereas technology performance
research comparing gender differences has been inconsistent, research comparing
gender attitudes is more consistent" (Picciano, 2011). In other words, as with most aspects of life,
boys and girls like different things. In
the case of technology usage, it appears that boys play more computer games
than girls, and more girls use social networking than boys. When planning lessons involving technology,
teachers need to be aware of the issue regarding gender differences, and avoid
using resources involving stereotypical depictions (Picciano, 2011).
Teachers have many
factors to take into account when planning a lesson. We must be purposeful in our planning, not
just plan technology integrated lessons for the sake of using technology. Teachers should always take the needs of
their students into consideration when planning lessons.
References
Bae,
Y., & Smith, T. (1997). Women in mathematics and science. National Center for Education Statistics, no. 11 (NCES 97-982). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97982.pdf
Picciano,
A. G. (2011). Educational Leadership and
Planning for Technology (5th ed., text). Boston: Pearson.
Setzer,
V. W. & Monke, L. (2001). An alternative view on why, when, and how
computers should be used in
education. Education and Technology: Critical and Reflective Practices. Retrieved from www.ime.usp.br/~vwsetzer/comp-in-educ.html
I'm surprised that there is an article out there that recommends that kids not be introduced to technology until puberty--at least I was until I noticed that the article was published in 2001. That was a long time ago--well before tablet devices came along. If the writers of the article object to the "forced thinking" caused by technology (and by this, I am inferring that they claim that technology forces its users to think in a particular way), then I wonder if their opinions have changed with the advent of tablet devices and apps that allow for creative problem solving and project development.
ReplyDeleteAlso,I see your point about avoid the use of resources that depict gender stereotypes in Technology-based lesson planning, but I wonder how many balanced resources there are out there. I have found a lot that are for girls specifically, and I've found a lot that are for not necessarily for boys in particular, but tend to feature boys more than girls. The former seems to be a reaction to the latter--almost an over correction of the problem, if you will. Finding balanced resources for balanced classes is more difficult than it should be.
Yes, there has been such a big push to "get girls more involved". I'm not surprised at all that you found more activities focused toward girls. In fact, our own state department has sponsored a program called GEMS-U (Girls Engaged in Math and Science) where teachers added lesson plans to a database on ALEX. Most of these lesson plans can be taught to co-ed classrooms, but they were specifically used with the GEMS-U groups at schools in order to apply to the annual GEMS-U Expo. The expo allows girls to complete math, science, and technology based lessons, and present the information they learned to other groups of girls throughout the state.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting that we all seemed to pick up on this issue of readiness in different ways, but we still all recognized that the research is struggling to keep up making it difficult to draw conclusions. Gradually more research will be published that will address the newer devices, apps, and wireless connectivity that make learning possible anywhere and anytime.
ReplyDeleteNo matter how new the technology is though, I believe that practice and experience make us better users of the technology. If as Picciano (2011)says, boys outperform girls because computer skills improve with use and practice, then teachers can support girls in their class with deliberate planning. As you said in your post, a teacher can plan for how often and which types of digital activities to include in their lesson plans. In addition to this, I think that grade levels in a school or district should determine each year which types of digital learning and programs/devices should be used during each grade and even quarter of the school year.