Distance education has evolved quite a bit over the years as
described in the text, Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning
(Moore & Kearsley, 2012). The writers describe “the most recent
generation of distance learning” as virtual learning. This virtual
learning is a combination of teaching and learning online, while attending
“classes” and universities using Internet technology (pg. 23).
This blog entry is a 3-2-1 post--3 things that impressed me, 2 things that surprised me, and 1 question I still have regarding virtual learning. While reading and viewing the material for the topic of virtual
learning, there were several points that I found interesting.
First of all, I was impressed that the State of Alabama
became the 2nd state in the country to create an online learning requirement. This program is called ACCESS. Our state often falls to the bottom of the list in many national polls,
so it is a nice change to be one of the “firsts”.
Another factor that impressed me was learning that some schools
have full time virtual teachers--that is all they do. Most of the schools
and virtual programs I am familiar with are taught by classroom teachers who
have virtual classes in addition to their regular workload. If teachers
were able to focus strictly on their virtual classes, they would be more likely
to treat their virtual students as face-to-face students. In fact, some
virtual teachers do try to treat their virtual students the same as their
face-to-face classroom students. This was the third idea that impressed me
about virtual learning. Several virtual teachers make efforts
to visit their virtual students in their “home” schools. For example, if
a virtual teacher has several students at one school, she makes an effort to
visit the school to meet the students face to face. This is an example of
the “humanizing” factor described in chapter 6 of the text. Humanizing
occurs when virtual teachers emphasize the importance of Students as
individuals and encourage group rapport (Moore & Kearsley, 2012, pg. 137).
There were also points regarding virtual learning that surprised
me. One of these was that several schools have had little interest in
virtual school in lieu of coming to class. The schools who offered this
as an option were larger schools attempting to lower their class sizes. One would think that students would jump at the chance to not go to school.
The virtual teachers believe that students see school as a social event,
and do not want to miss seeing their friends. I tend to agree with them.
I was also not aware that so many states have operational online
K-12 schools. According to the information provided in the module, 11 of
the 16 Southern Regional Educational Board states have K-12 online schools,
while there are 6 states with absolutely no public virtual schools. I
know that there are virtual programs available in our state, and that online
programs have become increasingly popular for post-secondary education, but I
did not know that so many states have online programs for K-12 schools.
With the current amount of technology usage in our society’s day to
day activities, I find it difficult to believe that there are still states
without public virtual schools. Operational online schools can provide
many opportunities for K-12 students that might not be available otherwise.
Many still have questions regarding virtual schools. One
question I still have is how are virtual classes and/or virtual learning
opportunities used in the elementary grades? Most of the information in
the module discussed how virtual learning is used in upper grades, particularly
eighth through twelfth grades. I also wonder if any states have current
models including the use of virtual programs in the elementary school. I have a few ideas for how virtual learning programs can be used in elementary grades. I have included these ideas in the infographic below.
The use of virtual learning programs is an interesting topic.
Many states are still working toward implementing these types of
programs. Although our society is technology-rich, the idea of using
technology in K-12 schools is still fairly new.
References
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. United
States: Wadsworth, Cenage Learning.
I am also surprised that several schools expressed little interest in virtual learning in lieu of coming to class. Moore and Kearsley (2012) explain that most students have little experience with online learning. The unfamiliarity with distance education can translate into resistance. Several eLearning programs that I researched for my infographic included a blended approach, allowing students to take classes on campus and online. The blended approach may be more effective in schools that are hesitant about transitioning from a traditional classroom setting.
ReplyDelete